The 56-RCT figure surprises most people. The evidence base for EFT is real but the field has methodological limitations: many studies are small (n under 100), blinding is difficult, and some studies have flaws in design that mainstream psychology research has not fully accepted.

This dataset lists each RCT with its primary outcome, sample size, comparison condition, effect size where reported, and methodological notes. It is the most accessible single inventory of the EFT clinical evidence base.

Schema

ColumnTypeDescription
study_labelstringAuthor, year identifier
conditionstringClinical condition or outcome (anxiety, depression, PTSD, etc.)
sample_sizeintegerTotal participants in study
comparisonstringComparison condition (waitlist, supportive interview, CBT, no treatment)
session_countintegerNumber of EFT sessions in protocol
effect_size_dnumberCohen's d effect size where reported
methodological_notesstringBrief notes on study quality, blinding, randomisation

Notes

Effect sizes vary in measurement and reporting standards across the original studies. Where effect sizes are not reported, the field is left blank rather than estimated.

Articles citing this dataset

More datasets